Observation 8756: Hydnaceae sensu lato
When: 2008-01-26
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: Dried specimen obtainable with permission
from el Herbario Nacional de Bolivia

Proposed Names

2% (2)
Recognized by sight
40% (3)
Recognized by sight
42% (3)
Recognized by sight: Possibility of a brown spore print vs a white print.
58% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
probably
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2016-01-16 11:39:28 PST (-0800)
isn’t it
By: Davide Puddu (Davide Puddu)
2016-01-13 11:59:56 PST (-0800)

rotten?

Doomed for dust collection
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2010-05-23 03:18:56 PDT (-0700)

Like many of the not-so-well documented specimens from these surveys (the methods and practices of which get a little more refined/comprehensive each season) this one will sit in the back of the digital filing cabinet until a sufficient quality and/or quantity of hydnoid fungi come along for this sad specimen to merit further attention.

substrate
By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2009-11-18 16:53:43 PST (-0800)

As Christian said, knowing what this mushroom was growing from would help a great deal with identification.

Substrate?
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2009-11-18 15:02:13 PST (-0800)

That little seedling on the bottom right in the photo looks like a baby conifer – was it on a cone of some sort? Otherwise I’d say Hydnum.

like an auriscalpium on steroids!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2008-08-08 07:48:13 PDT (-0700)

Created: 2008-08-07 23:30:20 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2016-01-13 12:17:48 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 198 times, last viewed: 2016-05-04 11:26:54 PDT (-0700)
Show Log