Observation 8756: Hydnaceae sensu lato
When: 2008-01-26
Herbarium specimen reported
0 Sequences

Notes:
Dried specimen obtainable with permission
from el Herbario Nacional de Bolivia

Proposed Names

2% (2)
Recognized by sight
40% (3)
Recognized by sight
42% (3)
Recognized by sight: Possibility of a brown spore print vs a white print.
58% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
probably
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2016-01-16 14:39:28 CST (-0500)
isn’t it
By: Davide Puddu (Davide Puddu)
2016-01-13 14:59:56 CST (-0500)

rotten?

Doomed for dust collection
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2010-05-23 06:18:56 CDT (-0400)

Like many of the not-so-well documented specimens from these surveys (the methods and practices of which get a little more refined/comprehensive each season) this one will sit in the back of the digital filing cabinet until a sufficient quality and/or quantity of hydnoid fungi come along for this sad specimen to merit further attention.

substrate
By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2009-11-18 19:53:43 CST (-0500)

As Christian said, knowing what this mushroom was growing from would help a great deal with identification.

Substrate?
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2009-11-18 18:02:13 CST (-0500)

That little seedling on the bottom right in the photo looks like a baby conifer – was it on a cone of some sort? Otherwise I’d say Hydnum.

like an auriscalpium on steroids!
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2008-08-08 10:48:13 CDT (-0400)

Created: 2008-08-08 02:30:20 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2016-01-13 15:17:48 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 200 times, last viewed: 2017-06-05 01:07:24 CDT (-0400)
Show Log