Observation 87914: Panaeolus (Fr.) Quél.

When: 2012-02-17

Collection location: Gainesville, Florida, USA [Click for map]

Who: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)

Specimen available

Proposed Names

29% (1)
Recognized by sight
Based on microscopic features: spores are too big and have a germ-pore.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2014-04-06 14:13:19 CDT (-0400)

sorry, missed your comment…

these micrographs were horrible.
i no longer have the specimens.

i can look on old drives and calculate the statistics w/ the information i have.

What were the spore statistics?
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2014-04-03 18:21:22 CDT (-0400)
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2012-04-15 09:38:14 CDT (-0400)

i no longer have the specimen.
it was misplaced with a few others.

I am not sure that spore size alone is enough to separate species
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2012-04-15 06:13:38 CDT (-0400)

Check the cystidia?

spores are too big.
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2012-04-15 03:45:30 CDT (-0400)
Why not Panaeolus cinctulus?
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2012-04-15 03:26:41 CDT (-0400)
thank you.
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2012-04-15 02:49:30 CDT (-0400)

still trying to figure out what it is.

Beautiful little mushroom.
By: Kari (Kari)
2012-04-14 22:23:42 CDT (-0400)

Fantastic photography, too.

any thoughts?
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2012-04-14 20:59:18 CDT (-0400)
they are…
By: Richard Kneal (bloodworm)
2012-03-17 09:45:18 CST (-0500)

i accidentally uploaded the wrong files.
i will fix when i get home from work.

Spore size
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2012-03-17 08:34:52 CST (-0500)

seems off?

Created: 2012-02-17 20:36:29 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2014-04-06 16:31:36 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 230 times, last viewed: 2015-12-04 16:02:00 CST (-0500)
Show Log