Observation 88655: Rubinoboletus caespitosus T.H. Li & Watling
When: 2007-03-29
Herbarium specimen reported

Notes: also in WU

Proposed Names

58% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight: This is in need of a new genus name since Rubinoboletus should no longer be used
Used references
Based on microscopic features

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Ok,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-10 17:50:04 EST (-0500)

thanks for the information.

Chalciporus
By: Roy Halling (royh)
2012-03-10 17:46:17 EST (-0500)

was where Klofac put R. phaeseolisporus. I have not requested any loans (yet). Other projects are on the front burners at the moment.

Well, if I remember right,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-10 17:32:33 EST (-0500)

it coulda been slightly viscid. Klofac ruled out R. phaseolisporus though if I remember well. But it certainly belongs to Tylopilus. The material is in Vienna. Did you loan the Tylopilus from Queensland as you wished some time ago?

NOT Rubinoboletus
By: Roy Halling (royh)
2012-03-10 17:00:52 EST (-0500)

but rather looks like a taxon described by Li & Watling from Western Australia that they called Rubinoboletus phaeseolisporus. Was it slightly viscid? It should have bean-shaped spores, some slightly ornamentation on the stipe and according to a prelim molecular analysis (from material in W Australia), sits on a clade with the ballouioids as a Tylopius. I will need to post the WA material I think. Thanks!

Should be placed
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-05 12:32:02 EST (-0500)

into Tylopilus.

Created: 2012-03-05 12:31:19 EST (-0500)
Last modified: 2012-03-05 12:31:20 EST (-0500)
Viewed: 68 times, last viewed: 2016-05-10 07:31:01 EDT (-0400)
Show Log