Observation 88691: Agaricus campestris L.
When: 2011-10-09
Herbarium specimen reported

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
Used references
Based on microscopic features

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
How? I have no photo tubus.
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-06 10:20:17 PST (-0800)

Tomorrow I’ll buy this thing which you can fasten to the mic.

If you have
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2012-03-06 09:59:11 PST (-0800)

a camera and a microscope, you can do it already..

I hope that in near future I can make microscopic photos
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-06 09:47:11 PST (-0800)

Tomorrow I will look for an apparatus or whatsoever this is called ;)

I have noticed!
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-03-06 09:42:08 PST (-0800)

I am constantly in awe at your Corticioid postings – maybe someday they will strike my fancy, but for now there are many other things to figure out in CA.

If you look at my postings,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-06 09:24:55 PST (-0800)

you will see that I am into Boletaceae and Corticiaceae. Ok, my postings are “universal” but those are my preferred ones.
As for the size of fruitbodies, there are always small ones and big ones as with humans, animals, plants and everything :)

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-03-06 09:17:23 PST (-0800)

You and Noah both…

I rather like Agaricus, but then again, CA has some really cool ones.

Not sure,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-06 09:11:49 PST (-0800)

actually I never dealt with varieties in this group. This is not my favorite kind of mushrooms.

Ditto Byrain’s comments
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-03-06 08:15:29 PST (-0800)

are any of the varieties supposed to be this much heavier-set?

There is a prominent ring present,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-06 04:43:36 PST (-0800)

but I agree that when I saw them in the field I didn’t suspect them to turn out A. campestris but microscopy and macrochemical reaction are fitting. However there is a similar A. pseudopratensis which I posted earlier. And there are some varieties of A. campestris too. Furthermore rich soil was present at the location.

By: Byrain
2012-03-06 04:39:00 PST (-0800)

Isn’t that annulus a bit prominent for A. campestris? Not to mention they look a bit firm, stocky, and don’t have a tapering stem. Compare with observation 87762, they don’t look like the same species to me.

Created: 2012-03-06 04:23:51 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2012-03-06 04:24:17 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 76 times, last viewed: 2016-10-23 15:40:22 PDT (-0700)
Show Log