Observation 89384: Dermoloma pseudocuneifolium Herink

Proposed Names

86% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight
Used references
Based on microscopic features

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Yes, I did.
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-17 07:07:00 EDT (-0400)

But it was a weary process :)
There are contradictory passages in literature. You have to use different sources to come to a conclusion and then I fear it is always subjective. The genus is in need of closer research I think but the finds are sparse. It took me hours to even find out the right genus for this find (that’s why there are no field photos) for it was almost frozen when I first sighted it and looked very unusual. Furthermore it grew in the wood and not on a meadow (ok, on a mossy clearing in the woods).

Did you change your mind
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2012-03-17 07:00:05 EDT (-0400)

from josserandii to pseudocuneifolium?
I find it extremely difficult to understand the differences between the species.
Fortunately, I haven’t found any other than cuneifolium, it’s variable enough :-)

They belong to the Tricholomataceae.
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-17 05:30:06 EDT (-0400)

Near Armillariella, Porpoloma and Camarophyllopsis.

new genus to me
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2012-03-16 18:53:33 EDT (-0400)

close relatives? distinguishing characteristics?

Created: 2012-03-15 07:01:29 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2012-03-15 07:01:32 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 148 times, last viewed: 2016-09-10 11:25:58 EDT (-0400)
Show Log