Observation 89397: Entoloma sericeum (Bull.) Quél.
When: 2011-09-10
Herbarium specimen reported

Proposed Names

70% (2)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight
Used references
Based on microscopic features
43% (2)
Eye3
Recognized by sight: as proposed by Andreas

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Ok, thanks …
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-23 04:56:03 PDT (-0700)

I am glad I did well with an Entoloma it’s not something I am used to :)

E. sericeum.
By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-23 02:04:33 PDT (-0700)

After a while I think this is not E. papillatum because the fruibodies showed grey-brownish instead of “warm” brown colors and the stipe is not polished or almost so.

Hmm, okay,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-15 07:29:39 PDT (-0700)

I would need to check the find again but then I am no expert on gilled ones so I do not know if I could ID it from exsiccata. What are the main differences between them two?

It’s really difficult
By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-15 07:26:48 PDT (-0700)

…to determine the most pinkgills without any microscopic details so my “believe” is more a “could be”. Because E. sericeum could also have caps with papilla as shown at your pics – E. papillatum is only a possibility. E. sericeum f. nolaniforme isn’t present in my mind at time, sorry.

Thank you,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-15 07:03:20 PDT (-0700)

I was not content with my ID nevertheless. Entoloma is so complicated I usually even refrain from collecting them although there are so many attractive species.
But what about E. sericeum fo. nolaniforme? Could that possibility ruled out once and for all?

Hmm
By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-15 06:58:12 PDT (-0700)

On the first look I believe to see E. papillatum.

Created: 2012-03-15 05:17:20 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2012-03-23 02:05:11 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 115 times, last viewed: 2017-06-10 08:54:34 PDT (-0700)
Show Log