Observation 89397: Entoloma sericeum (Bull.) Quél.
When: 2011-09-10
Herbarium specimen reported
0 Sequences

Proposed Names

70% (2)
Recognized by sight
Used references
Based on microscopic features
43% (2)
Recognized by sight: as proposed by Andreas

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Ok, thanks …
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-23 11:56:03 GMT (+0000)

I am glad I did well with an Entoloma it’s not something I am used to :)

E. sericeum.
By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-23 09:04:33 GMT (+0000)

After a while I think this is not E. papillatum because the fruibodies showed grey-brownish instead of “warm” brown colors and the stipe is not polished or almost so.

Hmm, okay,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-15 14:29:39 GMT (+0000)

I would need to check the find again but then I am no expert on gilled ones so I do not know if I could ID it from exsiccata. What are the main differences between them two?

It’s really difficult
By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-15 14:26:48 GMT (+0000)

…to determine the most pinkgills without any microscopic details so my “believe” is more a “could be”. Because E. sericeum could also have caps with papilla as shown at your pics – E. papillatum is only a possibility. E. sericeum f. nolaniforme isn’t present in my mind at time, sorry.

Thank you,
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-15 14:03:20 GMT (+0000)

I was not content with my ID nevertheless. Entoloma is so complicated I usually even refrain from collecting them although there are so many attractive species.
But what about E. sericeum fo. nolaniforme? Could that possibility ruled out once and for all?

By: Andreas (AK_CCM)
2012-03-15 13:58:12 GMT (+0000)

On the first look I believe to see E. papillatum.

Created: 2012-03-15 12:17:20 GMT (+0000)
Last modified: 2012-03-23 09:05:11 GMT (+0000)
Viewed: 115 times, last viewed: 2017-06-10 16:54:34 BST (+0100)
Show Log