Observation 90635: Phaeophyscia Moberg
When: 2012-03-10
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Maybe your comment might be better applied
By: zaca
2012-03-24 17:14:18 PDT (-0700)

to other of my observations (e.g. MO90860, Hahaha!).

Then you’ve got a new report for Portugal!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-03-22 15:29:15 PDT (-0700)

Haha! P. endococcina has no soredia. P. hirsuta is hairy (although admittedly they could simply be sparse and invisible in these photos, but even then, the soredia should be coarser). P. hispidula and P. nigricans have coarse isidioid soredia. Leaves only P. orbicularis. Or something like P. pusilloides which hasn’t been reported from there yet.

No.
By: zaca
2012-03-22 14:59:23 PDT (-0700)

The Phaeophyscia in the portuguese checklist are: P. endococcina, P. hirsuta, P.hispidula, P. nigricans, P. orbicularis. Initally I thought it could be a anusual form of P. orbicularis, but the thallus is too yellowish and the rhizines are too whitish (best seen in the 2nd specimen) for this species.

Far too many rhizines
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-03-21 22:22:32 PDT (-0700)

I think this is Phaeophyscia. Do you have P. pusilloides?

Created: 2012-03-21 18:06:43 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2012-03-26 15:32:03 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 155 times, last viewed: 2014-03-06 04:05:49 PST (-0800)
Show Log