Notes: This is the second observation of the same specimen considered in MO78268 that fortunately I was able to revisite more than six months later. Taking into account the conclusions obtained in that Observation, I was particularly alert to Physconia spp.. But not so much as I should, as you will see in forthcoming observations. Anyhow, in what concerns this observation the data obtained (see the photo of the underside and the K reaction) seems to confirm my previous suspicion.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
Created: 2012-04-10 17:02:53 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2012-04-10 17:07:16 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 6 times, last viewed: 2017-06-12 22:28:03 CDT (-0400)