Observation 95877: Boletus rubripes Thiers
When: 2012-05-29

Proposed Names

61% (2)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
I thought that accepted names on IF were shown in green…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-06-01 09:43:42 CDT (-0500)

both frustosus and calopus var. frustosus are currently blue on IF.

The later one
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-05-31 16:23:34 CDT (-0500)

that Thea found (with the sinuous, red stipe) seems like it was definitely B. rubripes, these might also be. The reticulations aren’t prominent on these fruitbodies, and the caps are really pale and not deeply cracked.

That said, they are developing some large plaques, and I have seen B. frustosus that had very weak reticulum.

I see
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-05-31 16:12:27 CDT (-0500)

described as its own species originally and lowered to variety status later.
I have to admit, that was just lazy on my part.

Boletus frustosus Snell & E.A. Dick 1941
By: else
2012-05-31 16:04:56 CDT (-0500)

from Index Fungorum and Mycobank!

The variety
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2012-05-31 11:15:02 CDT (-0500)

should be elevated to species status, since the nominate is a European species. I don’t know if that’s become ‘official’ yet.
These had reticulate upper stipes, although fairly obscure on some.

reticulate or non-reticulate stipe?
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2012-05-31 10:30:57 CDT (-0500)

can’t tell by your photo.

and whatever happened to Boletus calopus var. frustosus? It is what I would call this if the stipe is reticulate. Is this name in flux? Index Fungorum is little help.

Created: 2012-05-31 01:25:29 CDT (-0500)
Last modified: 2013-01-29 13:50:03 CST (-0600)
Viewed: 160 times, last viewed: 2016-10-27 07:46:08 CDT (-0500)
Show Log