|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||5.37||1||(Herbert Baker)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
After getting access to the aforementioned text and looking at the cross section of G. ravenelii, this specimen is indeed either G. meredithiae or G. curtisii.
So all I need do is take a thin, tangetnial section and look toward the pileus? Can you list the differences in such cells for me? I don’t have access to the text. That’ll also give me a nice shot of the interior context.
Ganoderma ravenelii is reported from North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, and Florida. It is similar to G. curtisii, but some differences are: stipe connection, interior context, density of pores, spore size, spore shape, and cuticle cells. It requires extra effort to examine those features! That is why retaining voucher specimens is necessary.
2008. Mycotaxon 103: 33-40.
I agree this is likely Ganoderma curtisii. That is my guess, too. I have examined a few from Georgia and they were all G. curtisii.
Your photo of the pore surface is a very important measurement for identifying these online. The density of its pores looks to be about 4-6 per millimeter.
But furthermore, experts require herbarium samples for determining species of Ganoderma. It is a requirement for identifying these with any certainty.
Another closely-related species is Ganoderma lucidum which has about 3-5 pores per millimeter, and probably grows in Georgia associated with hardwoods.
Created: 2012-06-22 00:02:35 UTC (+0000)
Last modified: 2012-07-18 14:31:33 UTC (+0000)
Viewed: 278 times, last viewed: 2017-08-01 00:02:33 UTC (+0000)