Observation 98844: Peltigera ponojensis Gyelnik
When: 2012-06-30
Who: zaca
No herbarium specimen

Proposed Names

47% (2)
Eye3
Recognized by sight
56% (1)
Eyes3
Recognized by sight: entirely white underneath with scattered simple rhizines and narrow raised veins
Used references: British Flora

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
To be perfectly honest
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-07-01 17:55:56 CDT (-0500)

I suspect the other observation of being P. ponojensis, too, but the visible detail is insufficient (for me) to prove the distinction. T. Goward has told me that the two species do not commonly overlap in habitat. (Of course, he promptly showed me two specimens growing side-by-side not minutes after that statement! :) So if these two observations were close to each other, looked the same, etc… then they probably are the same. I think we have enough detail in this observation to make a good case for P. ponojensis.

But let me just re-emphasize how little confidence I have! :)

Very subtle difference …
By: zaca
2012-07-01 17:12:39 CDT (-0500)

between this and the one considered in observation 98843. The only that I noticed was that the underside of this one was entirely pale, including rhizines, and the other has some dark rhizines and underside away from the margin. Apart from that they seem replica of each other, with tomentum on the upper side, upturned lobes at margin, etc.. Moreover, they were separated by 15-20 meters, with no other species of Peltigera arround.
Thanks, Jason, for being alert.

I’m still not comfortable distinguishing these two species
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-07-01 16:49:07 CDT (-0500)

But this one seems more like P. ponojensis than P. rufescens based on the characters described in the name reasons.

Created: 2012-07-01 15:29:10 CDT (-0500)
Last modified: 2012-07-01 16:34:16 CDT (-0500)
Viewed: 43 times, last viewed: 2016-09-21 15:01:35 CDT (-0500)
Show Log