When: 2008-08-28
Collection location: Franklin Twp., Somerset Co., New Jersey, USA [Click for map]
Who: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
- nrITS – GenBank #KJ466406 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- nrLSU – GenBank #KJ466469 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- beta-tubulin – GenBank #KJ466563 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- rpb2 – GenBank #KJ466649 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- tef1 – GenBank #KJ481983 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- nrITS – GenBank #KX270301 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
- nrLSU – GenBank #KX270328 [Show Archive Record | Run BLAST®]
Notes:
The material depicted was used for identification in an amatoxin poisoning. The cook of the curry ate the curry at two successive meals only 2 hours apart. Hence, she received a very large dose of the toxin compared to the her daughter and son-in-law who only tasted the meal very tentatively. Nevertheless, the last I heard they were still being observed in the hospital three days after ingestion. The cook and collector was a non-English-speaking immigrant from the Punjab in India. She collected the mushrooms near a neighbor’s tennis court, where she had mushroomed without negative incident in the past. She prepared a mushroom curry which was dominated by pieces of what was then determined as A. bisporigera. The death of the cook is the second death attributed A. bisporigera poisoning in the eastern U.S. that I know of this year.
For the information of persons doing taxonomic analysis of cooked mushrooms: In this case the cooking was gentle enough so that the typical amanita-structure of the gills was preserved. No stem pieces were used in the dish. The typical acrophysalidic stem tissue of amanitas normally survives cooking well, but there were no pieces of stem available. An attempt to use KOH on a cooked piece of cap (washed thoroughly with tap water) failed because a spice in the curry produced a brilliant red reaction with KOH.
[admin – Sat Aug 14 02:00:34 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Franklin Township, Somerset Co., NJ’ to ‘Franklin Township, Somerset Co., New Jersey, USA’
Species Lists
Images
The photograph is used by permission of the photographer.
The photograph is used by permission of the photographer.
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 5.49 | 1 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-2.54 | -84.60% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 5.49 | 1 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.85 | 28.20% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.49 | 1 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 2.31 | 1 | (jeeter) | |||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.13 | 71.13% |
Comments
Add Comment
Given its history, this robust Destroying Angel type should indeed have Walter’s name written all over it. Very fitting. Thanks for the perspective!

this species. He argued with me for years that the species was morphologically distinct; but I didn’t get it. Then it had to be segregated for genetic reasons, also. The end of the disagreement. He got honored for his persistence over a long, long period. Just look at his collecting dates on the web page for sturgeonii.
Very best,
Rod

I hope Walter doesn’t object to having his name associated with the killer mushroom! Maybe it should have been named after the victim instead? Well, none of this is material now, as the name has already been published (not nom. prov., anymore, I presume). Besides, the past, as we know it, is unalterable.

was published at the end of June, 2014 by Q. Cai et al.
Multiple genes from this collection are now listed in the “GenBank nos.” data field on the technical tab here:
http://www.amanitaceae.org?Amanita+sp-O01
R
R