Images

Proposed Names

57% (1)
Used references: Identified as such by a checker at Wildacres Foray
ret
82% (1)
Based on chemical features: nrITS and nrLSU sequences.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
Thank you Rod.
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2017-03-17 08:05:43 PDT (-0700)
Ron, I’m always glad when people ask for clarification on a specific collection.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-03-17 06:55:31 PDT (-0700)

Thanks very much for doing so.

Very best,

Rod

The sample sent in 2014 did not yield DNA for some reason.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-03-17 06:54:28 PDT (-0700)

A second sample was sent out in 2016. It was in the batch from which we are currently getting sequences. I am hoping that we get data in one of the next few data shipments.

Very best,

Rod

Ho Rod,
By: Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
2017-03-16 14:52:30 PDT (-0700)

I was wondering if this one was ever confirmed to be A. texasorora http://mushroomobserver.org/168062 ?

Just got the DNA for this one in a recent shipment of data.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-03-16 14:36:58 PDT (-0700)

Thanks so much for this collection and the images. One of the palest sets of material for this species. There’s a very significant range of pigment saturation in this taxon.

Very best,

Rod

Thanks Patrick,
By: groundhog
2014-10-14 09:33:00 PDT (-0700)

This material has been received and accessioned to Rod’s herbarium. We have scheduled it for DNA sequencing.
-Naomi