Observation 254972: Boletus durhamensis B. Ortiz et al.
When: 2016-10-03
Collection location: Monticello, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA [Click for map]
Who: dario.z (dario13)
Specimen available
Fungarium records:
Sequences:
Species Lists
Images
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 6.04 | 1 | (dario13) | |||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.07 | 2.50% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 6.04 | 1 | (dario13) | |||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.07 | 2.50% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 11.17 | 2 | (IGSafonov,dario13) | |||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.75 | 91.78% |
Comments
Add Comment
Dario, can I use your photos on the Bolete Filter?
By: Scott Pavelle (Scott Pavelle)
2018-08-28 13:08:03 EDT (-0400)
DNA confirmation is good enough for me, and it will be nice to have some shots from multiple finds. Observation 255349 as well.
Many thanks in advance! I have your full name from Igor and will use that in the credits.
Only good enough, Scott? :-)
Would you mind to elaborate on what kind of superior evidence (i.e., zero room for reasonable doubt in your parlance) beyond a perfectly matching sequence you need for a well-photographed non-holotype collection?