Who: Tom Bruns (pogon)
This name includes several ITS types.
|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||10.69||2||(pogon,Alan Rockefeller)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
For the MO observations that are supported by herbarium specimens, the “naming” suggestions should be done as “Comments:”, not by changing the observation names. The actual change of the MO observation name should be let on the original user who posted that particular MO observation.
Can you suggest this to MO gurus? They are ignoring my emails. All the best and apologies for making my stupid name change to your observation. Adolf
To me name changes in MO are very similar to those in a herbarium. Yes, people can change the name, but the original name is always visible. Name changes are often positive, and certainly some of the names I’ve proposed have been changed by others for the better. Of course proposed names are not always improvements, and I don’t always agree with them. The quality of the change always depends on the experience and thought put into it. One can’t change the behavior of others, but one can choose to behave in the best way possible. In public forums like MO, this is particularly important.
So if the proposed change to “Fungi” is made because you don’t think this could be Amphenima, I’m happy with it, though I do not agree with it. But if it’s simply a protest of the system, your protest has now been made and I ask you kindly to vote Amphenemia back up so that the post may be found by others when they are looking for what concepts of this taxon looks like.
Created: 2017-01-12 17:02:14 MST (-0700)
Last modified: 2017-01-13 17:26:01 MST (-0700)
Viewed: 115 times, last viewed: 2019-04-04 11:31:32 MDT (-0600)