When: 2017-09-16
Collection location: Mohican State Park, Ohio, USA [Click for map]
40.6128°N 82.3168°W 204m
Who: Django Grootmyers (heelsplitter)
Notes:
Growing in needle litter at the edge of a parking lot. Potential ECM hosts noticed in the area were Quercus spp., Pinus strobus, Tsuga canadensis, Fagus grandifolia, Carpinus caroliniana and Betula alleghaniensis (probably not for this one). Caps viscid. Odor not distinctive. Taste acrid. Latex watery and slowly drying green. and staining tissues green. Spharocysts present in the gill trama. Pleurocystidia present. Spores strongly amyloid and reticulate. Spore projections measured between 0.9 and 1.8 µm high. May have overlooked shorter projections. Spore measurements from Piximetre: (8.1) 8.2 – 9.1 (9.8) × (5.8) 6.1 – 6.9 (7) µm, Q = (1.2) 1.3 – 1.4 (1.5); N = 20, Me = 8.6 × 6.5 µm; Qe = 1.3
Individual spores: 8.73 × 6.84 µm, 8.32 × 6.52 µm, 8.22 × 6.04 µm, 8.43 × 6.54 µm, 8.73 × 6.68 µm, 9.11 × 6.35 µm, 8.89 × 6.91 µm, 8.34 × 6.25 µm, 8.63 × 6.59 µm, 8.11 × 6.11 µm, 8.34 × 6.51 µm, 8.93 × 6.59 µm, 8.81 × 6.38 µm, 8.46 × 5.80 µm, 8.29 × 6.45 µm, 9.84 × 6.93 µm, 8.21 × 6.57 µm, 8.39 × 6.60 µm, 8.08 × 6.20 µm, 9.40 × 6.98 µm
Species Lists
Images
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.79 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.89 | 29.69% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 5.79 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.44 | 14.59% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-0.86 | -28.56% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-0.86 | -28.56% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-0.86 | -28.56% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.99 | 1 | (heelsplitter) | |||||
Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 5.79 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.50 | 16.66% |
Comments
Add CommentThe spore measurements are a bit off for L. kauffmanii var. kauffmanii, but out of all of the available options, it seemed to be the best fit.
Created: 2018-02-04 20:32:12 -05 (-0500)
Last modified: 2019-02-11 11:51:57 -05 (-0500)
Viewed: 51 times, last viewed: 2019-02-11 23:42:00 -05 (-0500)
Show Log
The sequence which this matches (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/KF359599) is from the Smoky Mountains and is probably misnamed, while the west coast sequences (such as https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/KP889372) differ significantly. The west coast collections also have a much darker stem.