Name: Boletus eastwoodiae (Murrill) Sacc. & Trotter
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2009 Shane Marsh (Mushane)
Copyright © 2012 BakerSt10
Copyright © 2009 Richard Sullivan (enchplant)
Copyright © 2014 Ron Pastorino (Ronpast)
Version: 7
Previous Version 

First person to use this name on MO: Nathan Wilson
Editors: Darvin DeShazer, Ron Pastorino, I. G. Safonov


Rank: Species

Status: Deprecated

Name: Boletus eastwoodiae

ICN Identifier: missing

Index Fungorum search

MycoBank search

Author: (Murrill) Sacc. & Trotter

Citation: Syll. fung. (Abellini) 21: 237 (1912)

Preferred Synonyms:Rubroboletus eastwoodiae (Murrill) Vasquez, Simonini, Svetash., Mikšík & Vizzini,

Deprecated Synonyms: Suillellus eastwoodiae Murrill


Domain: Eukarya

Kingdom: Fungi

Phylum: Basidiomycota

Class: Agaricomycetes

Order: Boletales

Family: Boletaceae

Genus: Boletus

Notes on Taxonomy: [Edit]

The following was written by Mike Wood, the maintainer of MykoWeb:

Ah…the long and tortured history of the name Boletus eastwoodiae

Follow closely now for the inattentive can easily get lost….

Suillellus eastwoodiae (named for the botanist Alice Eastwood) is a Murrill name from 1910. It was transferred to Boletus in 1912 by Saccardo and Trotter. The name Boletus eastwoodiae is the name we used for years for what we now call Boletus pulcherrimus. When the type specimen of Boletus eastwoodiae was studied, it was found to be the same as what we have been calling Boletus satanas. To correct this, Thiers and Halling erected the name Boletus pulcherrimus in 1976.

Recently it’s been discovered (well maybe not that recently, if you are familiar with both the European and California material) that what we call Boletus satanas is different from the “real” Boletus satanas of Europe. Do a Google search for satanas and compare European photos with ours…the European material has different coloration of the cap and lacks the Abruptly bulbous base. Molecular studies apparently confirm the difference (but I have not seen this published). This means that we need another name for “our” Boletus satanas…and leaves us with Boletus eastwoodiae (remember the type is actually “our” B. satanas).

So yes, we should probably use the name Boletus eastwoodiae for “our” Boletus satanas.

Brief Description: [See More | Edit] Descriptions: [Create]


Add Comment
From Christian
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2012-02-07 23:03:56 AEDT (+1100)

B. eastwoodiae is definitely seriously toxic for most people.

Number of users interested in this name: 0