Name: Panellus serotinus (Pers.) Kühner
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2013 Sava Krstic (sava)
Copyright © 2013 Phil Yeager (gunchky)
Copyright © 2015 Phil Yeager (gunchky)
Copyright © 2008 Joshua Birkebak (Shua)
Version: 13
Previous Version

First person to use this name on MO: Erlon
Editors: Nathan Wilson, Danny Newman, walt sturgeon, Oluna & Adolf Ceska, Jacob Kalichman, GALL Alain


Domain: Eukarya

Kingdom: Fungi

Phylum: Basidiomycota

Class: Agaricomycetes

Order: Agaricales

Family: Mycenaceae

Genus: Panellus

Notes on Taxonomy: [Edit]

Current Name:
Panellus serotinus (Pers.) Kühner, C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 230: 1889 (1950)

Acanthocystis serotinus (Pers.) Konrad & Maubl., Icon. Select. Fung. 6: 364 (1937)
Agaricus serotinus Pers., in Hoffmann, Naturgetr. Abbild. Beschr. Schwämme (Prague) 3: 4 (1793)
Hohenbuehelia serotina (Pers.) Singer, Lilloa 22: 254 (1951) 1949
Panus serotinus (Pers.) Kühner, Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 49(Num. Spéc.): 895 (1980)
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871)
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871) f. serotinus
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871) var. serotinus
Sarcomyxa serotina (Pers.) P. Karst., Meddn Soc. Fauna Flora fenn. 18: 62 (1891)

Descriptions: [Create]


Add Comment
Can you ask MB, IF to correct?
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2017-11-13 06:54:45 MST (-0700)

Both MB & IF still have:
- Panellus serotinus as the current name,
- both Panellus and Sarcomyxa in Mycenaceae
(And for Sarcomyxa serotina, IF says “Nom. inval., Art. 35.2 (Melbourne)”).

Bad name
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2017-11-13 01:30:46 MST (-0700)

Sarcomyxa is in the Hygrophoraceae.

Nowhere near Panellus (Mycenaceae).

if both
By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2015-01-26 11:50:05 MST (-0700)

serotina and stipticus are in the same genus, that genus becomes super polyphyletic.

Why Panellus serotinus deprecated?
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2015-01-26 11:24:23 MST (-0700)

I see that MycoBank #433470 shows Panellus serotinus as the current name, despite the strangeness in the date. Cf. Index Fungorum record 433470
Can someone explain the date oddity (“1889 (1950)”) and why MO should prefer Sarcomyxa serotina?

Created: 2010-02-26 12:18:02 MST (-0700) by Erlon (Herbert Baker)
Last modified: 2017-07-16 15:38:52 MST (-0700) by Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
Viewed: 512 times, last viewed: 2019-03-22 03:00:46 MST (-0700)
Show Log