First person to use this name on MO: Erlon
Editors: Nathan Wilson, Danny Newman, walt sturgeon, Oluna & Adolf Ceska, Jacob Kalichman, GALL Alain
Observations of:
This Name (63)
This Taxon, other names (223)
This Taxon, any name (286)
Rank: Species
Status: Deprecated
Name: Panellus serotinus
Author: (Pers.) Kühner
Citation: C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 230: 1889 (1950)
Preferred Synonyms:Sarcomyxa serotina (Pers.) P. Karst.
Deprecated Synonyms: Agaricus serotinus, Acanthocystis serotinus (Pers.) Konrad & Maubl., Pleurotus serotinus, Pleurotus almeni, Agaricus almeni, Panus serotinus, Hohenbuehelia serotina (Pers.) Singer, Dendrosarcus almeni (Fr.) Kuntze, Dendrosarcus serotinus (Pers.) Kuntze, Pleurotus serotinus var. serotinus, Pleurotus serotinus f. serotinus, Pleurotus serotinus var. almeni, Pleurotus serotinus var. flaccidus
Misspellings: Sarcomyxa serotinus
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Fungi
Phylum: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Agaricales
Family: Mycenaceae
Genus: Panellus
Current Name:
Panellus serotinus (Pers.) Kühner, C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 230: 1889 (1950)
Synonymy:
Acanthocystis serotinus (Pers.) Konrad & Maubl., Icon. Select. Fung. 6: 364 (1937)
Agaricus serotinus Pers., in Hoffmann, Naturgetr. Abbild. Beschr. Schwämme (Prague) 3: 4 (1793)
Hohenbuehelia serotina (Pers.) Singer, Lilloa 22: 254 (1951) 1949
Panus serotinus (Pers.) Kühner, Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 49(Num. Spéc.): 895 (1980)
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871)
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871) f. serotinus
Pleurotus serotinus (Pers.) P. Kumm., Führ. Pilzk. (Zerbst): 108 (1871) var. serotinus
Sarcomyxa serotina (Pers.) P. Karst., Meddn Soc. Fauna Flora fenn. 18: 62 (1891)
Comments
Add Comment
Sarcomyxa is in the Hygrophoraceae.
Nowhere near Panellus (Mycenaceae).
serotina and stipticus are in the same genus, that genus becomes super polyphyletic.
I see that MycoBank #433470 shows Panellus serotinus as the current name, despite the strangeness in the date. Cf. Index Fungorum record 433470
Can someone explain the date oddity (“1889 (1950)”) and why MO should prefer Sarcomyxa serotina?
Created: 2010-02-26 19:18:02 GMT (+0000) by Erlon (Herbert Baker)
Last modified: 2017-07-16 23:38:52 BST (+0100) by Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
Viewed: 510 times, last viewed: 2019-02-12 19:55:14 GMT (+0000)
Show Log
Both MB & IF still have:
- Panellus serotinus as the current name,
- both Panellus and Sarcomyxa in Mycenaceae
(And for Sarcomyxa serotina, IF says “Nom. inval., Art. 35.2 (Melbourne)”).