Name: Pluteus chrysophlebius (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2011 Dan Molter (shroomydan)
Copyright © 2011 Brian Adamo (adamo588)
Copyright © 2015 Dave W (Dave W)
Copyright © 2014 Eva Skific (Evica)
Version: 3
Previous Version 


First person to use this name on MO: Hamilton
Editors: walt sturgeon, Jimmie Veitch

Nomenclature:

Rank: Species

Status: Accepted

Name: Pluteus chrysophlebius

Author: (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.

Citation: Syll. fung. (Abellini) 5: 678 (1887)

Deprecated Synonyms: Pluteus admirabilis Peck, Pluteus aurantiacus Murrill

Classification:
Brief Description: Descriptions: [Create]

Comments

Add Comment
chrysophlebius = admirabilis
By: Alfredo Justo (Fredo)
2018-07-26 10:25:48 MDT (-0600)

The issue of whether chrysophlebius and admirabilis are the same has been discussed at length over decades. For a good overview (including type revisions and lectotypifications) see Minnis & Sundberg (2010):

https://openjournals.wsu.edu/...

I agree with their conclusion that P. chrysophlebius and P. admirabilis are one and the same. Both names are valid, and if you consider them synonyms then P. chrysophlebius should be used.

A lot of discussion on the (potential) synonymy
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2018-07-23 21:17:04 MDT (-0600)

is in https://www.tandfonline.com/.... I wonder if Fredo has an opinion.

P. chrysophlebius in MB
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2018-07-22 22:06:54 MDT (-0600)
Pluteus chrysophlebius is not recognized in MycoBank
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2018-07-22 17:14:51 MDT (-0600)

Pluteus admirabilis is not deprecated on Index Fungorum. Are these databases out of date or am I missing something?

Created: 2010-10-11 22:25:40 MDT (-0600) by Hamilton (ham)
Last modified: 2019-01-01 10:00:42 MST (-0700) by walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
Viewed: 576 times, last viewed: 2019-06-14 10:38:56 MDT (-0600)
Show Log