Name: Entoloma subg. Pouzarella (Mazzer) Noordel.
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2017 Cody Morgan (Cody)
Copyright © 2019 Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
Copyright © 2017 Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
Version: 3
Previous Version 


First person to use this name on MO: Jacob Kalichman
Editors: Excited delirium [EXD]▼, Joseph D. Cohen

Nomenclature:

Rank: Subgenus

Status: Accepted

Name: Entoloma subg. Pouzarella

[#840563] Index Fungorum

[#840563] MycoBank

Author: (Mazzer) Noordel.

Citation: Persoonia 12(3): 196 (1984)

Deprecated Synonyms: Pouzarella Mazzer

Classification:

Domain: Eukarya

Kingdom: Fungi

Phylum: Basidiomycota

Class: Agaricomycetes

Order: Agaricales

Family: Entolomataceae

Genus: Entoloma

Subgenus: Entoloma subg. Pouzarella

Lifeform:
Brief Description: [See More | Edit]

Taxa of Pouzarella are easily recognised both by macro- and micromorphological characters. In the field, species of Entoloma subgen. Pouzarella are often overlooked due to their small and dull-coloured basidiomes. However, the inconspicuous species are widespread and have been reported from tropical to temperate regions. So far, more than seventy species have been described worldwide. However, many species have in common small basidiome size and greyish colours and, therefore, it is difficult to distinguish them to species by morphological characters only.

https://mycokeys.pensoft.net/article/24998/

“The subgenus Pouzarella is a rather distinctive group within the large genus Entoloma, and is characterized by the usually small, mycenoid habitofthe fruit-bodies, distinctive long, encrusted and loften setiform hairs on pileus and stipe, the nodulose spores, clamp- less hyphae, and rather well differentiated trichodermal pileipellis with encrusted, and sometimes also intracellular pigments (Noordeloos,1979,1987).”

https://repository.naturalis.nl/...

The name Pouzarella is applied to fungi in the Entolomataceae that possess stipitate–pileate basidiomata with the following features: basidiome typically mycenoid with a strigose stipe base, pileipellis disc composed of erect to semi-erect multicellular hyphae, tramal hyphae with encrusted pigments, nodulose heterodiametric 5–9-angled basidiospores, and the absence of clamp connections. Phylogenetically, these fungi form a well-supported clade (He et al. 2013), and Pouzarella Mazzer is applied as a generic concept (Mazzer 1976; Karstedt et al. 2007; Baroni et al. 2008, 2012; Horak 2008) or is treated as Entoloma subg. Pouzarella (Mazzer) Noordel. (Manimohan et al. 2006, Noordeloos 2004, He et al. 2013). We treat Pouzarella as a genus because all species form a monophyletic group with distinctive morphological characters.

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/...

Descriptions: [Create]

Comments

Add Comment
Final Update For Now
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-09-12 19:34:11 JST (+0900)

This name is now properly listed on both IF and MB.

Added
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-09-07 21:09:06 JST (+0900)

Update: This name was added to Mycobank late last night. It should automatically be added to IF later this week. I added the number to MO. Thanks to everyone who contributed in a positive, respectful (respectable), and dignified manner.

Notes: https://mushroomobserver.org/...

Publications
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2021-09-03 05:01:45 JST (+0900)

Entoloma subg. Pouzarella seems to have been validly published in https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/532016, which is available for free download. It’s not clear to me why the first publication (source of the basionym Pouzarella, which is already in MB & IF) or the second would be necessary here.

Update
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-09-02 19:14:29 JST (+0900)

So it turns out K.B. may need to see a copy of A Monographic Study of the Genus Pouzarella: A New Genus in the Rhodophyllaceae Agaricales, Basidiomycetes. ISBN 3768210545 or 9783768210546. Publication date 1976. 191 pages. Series: Bibliotheca Mycologica Bd. 46. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/927934

However, I happen to be permanently on-the-road (with limitations), and I cannot access a digital or physical copy of this text. Can someone please try really hard to get a copy of the above text? We need to see the original publication text of this taxon with a description.

https://www.worldcat.org/...

https://www.schweizerbart.de/series/bibl_mycol

https://books.google.com.mx/...

https://www.amazon.com/...

We may also need to see: Entoloma (Agaricales) in Europe: Synopsis and keys to all species and a monograph of the subgenera Trichopilus, Inocephalus, Alboleptonia, Leptonia, Paraleptonia, and Omphaliopsis / by Machiel Evert Noordeloos. 1987. 419 pages. https://www.si.edu/object/siris_sil_348858

Possible Point Of Contact:
https://twitter.com/machielnoordel1
http://machielnoordeloos.nl/

Update
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-09-01 23:50:20 JST (+0900)

I just heard back from K.B. at MB:

Sorry for the delay. Before I left for holidays we sent out a big reminder email to all Mycobank users who had deposited names in Mycobank which have however not yet been released.

Probably your email got ‘lost’ in between all the replies and releases. The last two weeks I was on holiday with the family.

With regard to your question below, Mycobank will include all scientific names of fungi, and related organisms, which are effectively published or where it was the authors intention to effectively publish a scientific name. The status of the name – valid or not, legitimate or not – will then be indicated. Names without a bibliographic reference will not be added.

Best regards,
Konstanze

Note: To register yourself at Mycobank, please use the following link:
https://www.mycobank.org/profile/register

Note #2: To register yourself at IF, please see:
http://indexfungorum.org/Names/IndexFungorumRegisterUser.asp

Thanks!
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2021-08-27 08:33:35 JST (+0900)

Excited:

Thanks for posting the email. It clears up a misunderstanding of mine. I thought you were talking about a proposed listing of a specific name (e.g., Entoloma subg. Pouzarella).

Reply To Joe
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-26 23:57:08 JST (+0900)

This is the exact email text I sent last:

Hi Dr. Bensch! I have been trying to reach you for a couple weeks, and I have started to become concerned. I just had a simple question if you or a colleague could please answer.

Do the curators of the nomenclature database Mycobank want MushroomObserver.org contributors to submit names that are:
- Not effectively published? or
- Not validly published? or
- Not legitimate? or
- Otherwise failing meet the formal requirements of the ICN?

What if a name falls within one of these categories, yet that name is completely missing from MB/IF?

Regarding the email to IF, that response was already posted in our discussion below.

Reply To Jacob
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-26 23:56:17 JST (+0900)

No, I only entered the first three fields – if I recall correctly. The issue here does not seem to be related to that. It appears everyone is “Out-Of-Office”, and no designated backup team or liasion has been hired/implemented. If you can try to reach them by email and phone, I think that would be more efficacious.

Exactly what did you send to MB
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2021-08-26 23:53:31 JST (+0900)

Excited:
1.Would you mind posting the email (and any attachments) you sent to MB?
(It’s hard for others to guess why they aren’t responding when we don’’t know what they’re supposed to be responding to.)
2. Did you send something to IF, and if so, what was the response?

Did you provide the original description for this name to IF/MB?
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2021-08-26 23:31:47 JST (+0900)

If so, I’m not sure why they wouldn’t add an entry for it. If not, I can do it.

Non-Update
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-26 22:45:14 JST (+0900)

I still have not heard back, which is very unusual. Does anyone else have an alternative method to raise someone from MB?

Update
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-21 21:56:58 JST (+0900)

Still no word yet for some odd reason, so I emailed her alternative address and added a cc to g.verkleij@wi.knaw.nl (from https://wi.knaw.nl/).

Update
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-10 12:32:44 JST (+0900)

…Still waiting on a response from MB, but I did get a response from Faces Of Fungi:

We only deposit legitimate names that are validly published.

https://www.facesoffungi.org/
https://www.facesoffungi.org/...

Thanks re effective publication
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2021-08-09 22:37:51 JST (+0900)

Thanks for the info about submission to IF.

Follow Up
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-09 16:48:57 JST (+0900)

I asked Paul Kirk. Here’s what he replied:

Index Fungorum will include all scientific names of fungi, and related organisms, which are effectively published or where it was the authors intention to effectively publish a scientific name. The status of the name – valid or not, legitimate or not – will then be indicated. Names without a bibliographic reference will not be added. If you have names which fall into the above category, please send me the details … if there are more than five, a spreadsheet would speed up processing.

I also sent correspondence to Konstanze Bensch. I will update you once I hear back.

Names not complying with ICN
By: Joseph D. Cohen (Joe Cohen)
2021-08-09 08:46:21 JST (+0900)

Question:
Do the curators of the nomenclature databases want MO users to submit names that are:
- Not effectively published? or
- Not validly published? or
- Not legitimate? or
- Otherwise failing meet the formal requirements of the ICN

Check 2021-08-05 06:56:25 PDT (-0700)
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)Tip: If anyone notices that a name is missing from Index Fungorum, please submit the name here: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/IndexFungorumAdd.asp

We need more contributors (who are trustworthy and accurate) to volunteer a bit of time at both IF and Mycobank.org. To add a name to Mycobank, please visit: https://www.mycobank.org/page/Release%20names

I just submitted the name to IF, with very limited info inputed. Let’s see if it loads in a few days.

Note: Please contact Paul Kirk if you you would like to contribute to Species Fungorum. mailto:p.kirk@kew.org

Check
By: Excited delirium [EXD]▼ (Excited delirium [EXD]▼)
2021-08-05 22:56:25 JST (+0900)

Tip: If anyone notices that a name is missing from Index Fungorum, please submit the name here: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/IndexFungorumAdd.asp

We need more contributors (who are trustworthy and accurate) to volunteer a bit of time at both IF and Mycobank.org. To add a name to Mycobank, please visit: https://www.mycobank.org/page/Release%20names

I just submitted the name to IF, with very limited info inputed. Let’s see if it loads in a few days.

Note: Please contact Paul Kirk if you you would like to contribute to Species Fungorum. mailto:p.kirk@kew.org

neither IF nor MB
By: Danny Newman (myxomop)
2015-03-16 11:23:04 JST (+0900)

have any record of this subgenus ever having been described.

Number of users interested in this name: 1