First person to use this name on MO: Oluna & Adolf Ceska
Editors: Danny Newman, Erlon Bailey, I. G. Safonov
Observations of:
Rank: Species
Status: Accepted
Name: Lentinus brumalis
Author: (Pers.) Zmitr.
Citation: International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms (Redding) 2010 12(1), p. 88
Deprecated Synonyms: Polyporus brumalis (Pers.) Fr., Polyporellus brumalis (Pers.) P. Karst.
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Fungi
Phylum: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Polyporales
Family: Polyporaceae
Genus: Lentinus
Comments
Add Comment
It looks good to me.
at least one polyporologist seems to think this Zmitrovich paper is a joke. that might have something to do with MycoBank’s opinion. i was suspicious when I saw it was in the International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. That’s John Holliday’s minimally peer-reviewed repository for all manner of mushroom crackpottery.
Created: 2015-11-22 14:43:14 CST (-0500) by Oluna & Adolf Ceska (aceska@telus.net)
Last modified: 2018-11-08 23:59:13 CST (-0500) by Erlon Bailey (Herbert Baker)
Viewed: 530 times, last viewed: 2020-08-11 16:43:19 CDT (-0400)
Show Log
Trying to keep discussion of names/taxa on their pages…
This seems to be a good name despite the few-year-old belowmentioned hearsay. See, for example, Motato-Vasquez et al, 2018, on Bresadolia (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1416-3) – the ITS+LSU tree clearly & confidently keeps this species with Lentinus, away from Polyporus.