Name: Leucoagaricus flammeotinctus comb. prov.
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2009 Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
Copyright © 2015 Christian (Christian Schwarz)
Copyright © 2013 Christian (Christian Schwarz)
Version: 6
Previous Version 


First person to use this name on MO: Christian
Editors: Alan Rockefeller, Erlon Bailey, Jacob Kalichman

Nomenclature:

Rank: Species

Status: Deprecated

Name: Leucoagaricus flammeotinctus

Author: comb. prov.

Citation:

Preferred Synonyms:Lepiota flammeotincta Kauffman, Leucoagaricus flammeatinctus comb. prov.

Deprecated Synonyms: Lepiota flammeatincta Kauffman

Misspellings: Leucoagaricus flammeatincta nom prov.

Classification:
Lifeform:
Descriptions: [Create]
There are no descriptions for this name yet.

Comments

Add Comment
Deprecated
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2016-10-31 21:38:55 EDT (-0400)

Else’s preferred spelling.

Else implicitly indicated
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2016-09-21 15:42:18 EDT (-0400)

not to put Vellinga in the Leucoagaricus name…

Ok…
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2016-09-21 11:03:43 EDT (-0400)

comb. prov. should be appended to this name in place of nom. prov. when the code allowing such is approved.

Name mess… help!
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2016-09-20 16:09:26 EDT (-0400)

Right now there are two names:

Leucoagaricus flammeotincta (i.e., this page)
http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/51334

Leucoagaricus flammeatincta nom prov.
http://mushroomobserver.org/name/show_name/20631

Neither of those is right, it should be: “Leucoagaricus flammeotinctus comb. prov.” (which IMO should be approved as a synonym of Lepiota flammeotincta Kauffman; all the others should be deprecated synonyms)

What is the cleanest way to resolve this? Why are some observations showing up on the pages for both existing names?

Number of users interested in this name: 0