Name: Singerocybe phaeophthalma (Pers.) Harmaja
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2019 Eva Zupan (Eva Zupan)
Copyright © 2010 Irene Andersson (irenea)
Copyright © 2008 Irene Andersson (irenea)
Copyright © 2014 James Baker (cepecity)
Version: 2
Previous Version 

First person to use this name on MO: Eva Skific
Editors: Jacob Kalichman


Rank: Species

Status: Accepted

Name: Singerocybe phaeophthalma

Author: (Pers.) Harmaja

Citation: Karstenia 27(2): 72 (1988) 1987

Deprecated Synonyms: Clitocybe phaeophthalma (Pers.) Kuyper

Misspellings: Clitocybe phaeopthalmia


Genus: Singerocybe

Descriptions: [Create]
There are no descriptions for this name yet.


Add Comment
Yes, they are still synonyms
By: Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
2017-12-14 22:17:14 EST (-0500)

“Deprecated synonym” means the same thing as “Non-preferred synonym”.

Clitocybe phaeophthalma is a legitimate name; it is synonymous with Singerocybe phaeophthalma; but it’s a (slightly) inferior name.

I still cannot get it!
By: Oluna & Adolf Ceska (
2017-12-14 21:47:29 EST (-0500)

Are deprecated synonyms still synonyms even after they have been deprecated?
Why do you have to deprecate Clitocybe phaeophthalma (Pers.) Kuyper when it is a “good” synonym. I don’t see anything wrong with it and I don’t see any reason for its deprecation! Or, is it something here what I should know and don’t know?

Created: 2016-10-26 08:23:55 EDT (-0400) by Eva Skific (Evica)
Last modified: 2018-11-09 18:23:23 EST (-0500) by Jacob Kalichman (Pulk)
Viewed: 63 times, last viewed: 2019-10-04 12:18:31 EDT (-0400)
Show Log