Name: Amanita vaginata group
Most Confident Observations:
Copyright © 2010 A. Cortés-Pérez (Alonso)
Copyright © 2008 Ian Dodd Kundabung NSW Australia
Version: 7
Previous Version 


Nomenclature:

Rank: Group or Clade

Status: Accepted

Name: Amanita vaginata group

Author:

Citation:

Classification:

Domain: Eukarya

Kingdom: Fungi

Phylum: Basidiomycota

Class: Agaricomycetes

Order: Agaricales

Family: Amanitaceae

Genus: Amanita

Lifeform:
Descriptions: [Create]
There are no descriptions for this name yet.

Comments

Add Comment
Because of the argument below, I have removed all synonyms for this name.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2018-09-26 07:32:28 WIB (+0700)
This term should remain vague for reasons given below.

Rod

Despite Alan’s observation in 2017, this name is now proposed as equivalent to…
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2018-09-26 07:28:17 WIB (+0700)

a specific authorship citation in association with Amanita sect. Vaginatae. This is clearly a mistake. I don’t want to deprecate this name it has an informal use that is valuable on MO especially for non specialists.

It needs to be decoupled from Amanita sect. Vaginatae.

…..

contextual comment:

I am aware that my favored citation for Amanita sect. Vaginatae has been deprecated. I think that has been a mistake. It is a very specific name and has a very specific meaning.

Amanita section Vaginatae sensu Zhu L. Yang” indicates the moment at which a major taxonomic work rejected the idea of inclusion of the Caesareae within the Vaginatae.

To allow something as vague as “Amanita vaginata group” to replace something substantiated by 21 years of taxonomic work and extensive teaching (including teaching here on MO) is very unfortunate.

Taxonomists can use the name that they feel serves their purpose. Since we currently have two sets of “authorities” that different people want to use for Amanita section Vaginatae, let’s recognize both of them as in use; but, please, let’s not make either of them an equivalent of “Amanita vaginata group”.

I would argue, for example, that it is imprecise and could be understood to specify a group containing Amanita vaginata var. alba, but not the species of series Ceciliae or those of series Penetratirices or or those of stirps Crocea or those of many other small to medium sized groups of species that are distinctive and fall in section Vaginatae.

Very best,

Rod

Approved
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2017-09-02 01:48:49 WIB (+0700)

Amanita vaginata group is a smaller group than Amanita sect. Vaginatae – the section includes species like A. fulva which do not resemble Amanita vaginata.

Created: 2008-08-22 04:19:28 WIB (+0700) by Dan Molter (shroomydan)
Last modified: 2018-09-26 07:32:28 WIB (+0700) by Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
Viewed: 614 times, last viewed: 2019-01-24 09:53:37 WIB (+0700)
Show Log