When: 2012-09-02

Collection location: Zona de Almargem do Bispo – Loures, Portugal [Click for map]

Who: zaca

No specimen available

Species Lists

Images

Chemical reactions.
Microscopy.

Proposed Names

-29% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I thought Aspicilia, too!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2012-09-07 01:05:32 CDT (-0400)

You get all the cool Caloplaca, it’s not fair. :)

Big surprise!
By: zaca
2012-09-06 18:37:26 CDT (-0400)

When started to observe the spores I though that I had chosen the wrong genus, because the asci had more than 8 spores each. The conclusion was correct but by another reason. In fact, the asci had 8 polarilocular spores each. So, at the end I recognize that it must be my “very old friend” Caloplaca variabilis , which as the name suggests is indeed very variable (see observation 67542 and observation 79945 for another forms of this species) or a similar species. Looking into the Briish Flora I found a species, Caloplaca chalybaea, with features that fit very well: the thallus can be either dark (as C. variabilis) or lead-grey, the apothecia are immersed in the thallus and can be several per areole. The chemisty of the two species are similar, though C. chalybaea is said to be K+/- pale purple on apothecia and C. variabilis is said to be K-. The latter species can present longer and wider spores. I believe that this is C. chalybaea, but can’t exclude the possibility of being C. variabilis.
In my defense I can argue that in British Flora is written:“Superficially resembles an Aspicilia in habit but readily distinguished by the polarilocular ascospores”.