Observation 11: Xerocomellus dryophilus (Thiers) N. Siegel et al.
When: 1996-02-15
Collection location: Chumash Interpretive Center, Thousand Oaks, California, USA [Click for map]
No specimen available
Notes:
The date is only accurate to the month.
This is a reasonably common brown variant that I still think is X. dryophilus rather than X. chrysenteron due to the pinched base and the tendancy to grow in the exact same habitat and time of year. Compare to the reddish form found on the same day at the same site.
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.82 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 4.88 | 1 | (Christian Schwarz) | |||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.66 | 21.90% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.88 | 1 | (Christian Schwarz) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.66 | 55.34% | |||||||
Comments
Add CommentCreated: 2006-05-21 03:17:25 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2014-07-23 14:00:02 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 247 times, last viewed: 2019-11-14 11:29:03 CST (-0500)
Show Log
I’d never seen this brownish form, but I agree with your judgment that it’s just a duller dryophilus.