Observation 209842: Undetermined



Proposed Names

29% (1)
Recognized by sight
57% (1)
Eye3 Eyes3
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus


Add Comment
Jim Bennett had better specimen, it seems,
By: Andrew Khitsun (Andrew)
2016-03-13 18:40:15 CDT (-0400)

or the one that survived better. It’s about half inch by half inch rock, covered by the “subject”. But his verdict is “no ID – highly eroded sterile thallus” :-(

I’ll suggest it to James! :)
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2016-02-16 17:25:29 CST (-0500)

I think it was just too scanty to do anything with. You need enough material to be confident of the type of soralia, and have enough to be able to spare some for TLC. This was just a bunch of dust scraped off the rock! :)

By: J-Dar
2016-02-16 17:10:06 CST (-0500)

Meaning they couldn’t identify it without reproductive parts, or that the specimen was too scanty to be worthy of keeping?

Maybe if you put it on your windowsill for a few decades it will produce an apothecia or something identifiable!

By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2016-02-16 12:30:03 CST (-0500)

The specimen was insufficient for NYBG to do anything with it. This will have to remain a mystery.

Chemistry interesting
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2016-01-12 17:09:41 CST (-0500)

K~ C+ pink KC+ gold P- UV-. But no apothecia, perithecia, pycnidia, soredia, isidia, anything. Not much to go on. :( Maybe some species of Biatora??

By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2015-07-13 01:26:58 CDT (-0400)

Might it look like this before it produces apothecia?

Created: 2015-07-12 21:31:12 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2017-03-24 16:43:38 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 60 times, last viewed: 2017-07-20 02:12:20 CDT (-0400)
Show Log