When: 2016-01-05

Collection location: Parque de Monsanto, Lisboa, Portugal [Click for map]

Who: zaca

Specimen available


Microscopy: Pileipellis-1 (in congo red);
Microscopy: Pileipellis- 2 (a drop of lugol added).

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2018-11-10 04:25:36 PST (-0800)

I don’t know about that. But morphologically this looks the same. I thought they were synonyms, The odor is rather distinctive.

By: zaca
2018-11-10 02:35:11 PST (-0800)

I don’t know that species. As it the same type of pileipellis than Clitocybe phaeophthalma_?, which is very distinctive btw.

Where does Singerocybe adirockensis
By: walt sturgeon (Mycowalt)
2018-11-09 17:00:01 PST (-0800)

fit in to this?

By: zaca
2018-11-09 06:14:40 PST (-0800)

Clitocybe phaeophthalma is the current name in Index Fungorum and, moreover, this name is older than
Singerocybe phaeophthalma

no problem
By: Davide Puddu (Davide Puddu)
2016-01-07 03:01:01 PST (-0800)

It looked very typical

Thanks, Davide, for this accurate shot!
By: zaca
2016-01-06 17:54:05 PST (-0800)
The key is the pileipellis:
By: zaca
2016-01-06 17:50:45 PST (-0800)

Clitocybe phaeophthalma has as a distinguish feature the existence of vesiculose hyphae in the pilei trama. The photos attached show clearly this feature for these specimens.