When: 2009-09-11

Collection location: Lennox Forest, East Dunbartonshire, Scotland [Click for map]

Who: clancy

No specimen available


Proposed Names

-5% (3)
Recognized by sight
61% (2)
Used references: See comments from RET.
55% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
Yes, Paul
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2009-09-25 18:03:58 CEST (+0200)

Contu (who doesn’t know the taxon so far as I know), simply proposed a name on the grounds that I had said it was a new taxon. Apparently, he was a bit hasty and didn’t fulfill the requirements of the Intl. Bot. Code of Nomenclature. Actually, I planned to use a different name; but Contu’s name is (occasionally) in use. I don’t want to change it just for my bruised ego. :) I will eventually validate Contu’s name.


By: Paul Derbyshire (Twizzler)
2009-09-25 16:01:33 CEST (+0200)

is the name considered “nom. inval.” rather than “nom. prov.”?

The graying upper part of the volval sack….
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2009-09-25 15:52:20 CEST (+0200)


The graying upper part of the volval sack is not a character associated with A. vaginata.

In Scotland, I have personally collected a species that has a rather deep brown cap and a graying upper portion of the volval sack. This material has been incorrectly referred to Amanita submembranacea in the past.
After a review of the type collection of Amanita submembranacea var. bispora D. A. Reid (published in Mycotaxon in 1994), I concluded that the entity was an undescribed species. An invalid name was proposed for the species by Dr. M. Contu — A. castaneogrisea. The name has not been validated, but it is in use:


The picture at the site is a bit too dark, and the fruiting bodies are older than the ones in your pic; however, your pix and mine (from the Highlands and Islands Region) seem very similar to me.

Very best,


P.S. The range of “castaneogrisea” extends to Norway at least.