When: 2016-09-13
Collection location: Ugut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug—Yugra, Russia [Click for map]
60.5038°N 74.0677°E 54m [Click for map]
Who: Tatiana Bulyonkova (ressaure)
Notes:
A very common species late in season in dry Scots pine forest around the village
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.91 | 1 | (ressaure) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.66 | 55.38% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.91 | 1 | (ressaure) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.66 | 55.38% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 4.91 | 1 | (ressaure) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.49 | 83.07% | |||||||
Comments
Add Commentof one of these smaller C. glandicolor clones (they’re maybe 1-2 cm in diameter), but I agree that it’s kind of too ascetic a vision…
Also,
I checked the spores of my September collections and it looks like I’ve outdone myself LBM-wise this time, because the slightly different groups we collected in a relatively small patch of forest near my home turned out to be C. coleoptera, C. carabus, AND C. cicindela (…and C. glandicolor and C. cf. ectypus and at least one other member of the sect. Brunnei, but all of those are much bigger). I’ll add some more photos a bit later.
God also has an inordinate fondness for corts.
I was hoping for something more… entomological. who looks at a species epithet ‘coleoptera’ and thinks “blackish brown and small” anyway? there are brilliantly colored, enormous coleopterans, are there not? boo!
thank you for the explanation all the same
because only a couple of photos of each species exist in the Internet.
But both C. carabus and C. coleoptera (and C. cicindela for that matter) are little brown cousins of C. brunneus (sect. Brunnei). They’re all named so “entomologically” because they’re blackish brown and small :)
I actually think I’m mistaken with the id here: it’s either C. carabus or C. cicindela. I’ll re-check the spores.
collected in the same area. I’m tempted to say that this one is C. cicindela based on the relatively ovid spores: Soop’s key splits small narrow-spored Brunneus-type Corts into C. carabus and C. cicindela based on spore shape – the one with ovoid spores is C. cicindela and the one with dacryoid spores is C. carabus, but in this case, this one’s spores are a bit too wide. It does look different – macro- and microscopically – from the second narrow-spored brown cort: observation 270176