Notes:
collected for RET

Images

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
I do apparently see a LOT
By: Geoff Balme (geoff balme)
2017-07-25 20:21:27 -05 (-0500)

of A. subcokeri so it would not surprise me a bit. It may be the more common Lepidella in my area.

The recurved scales on the bulb sure look like what you’d see in subcokeri.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-07-25 16:53:28 -05 (-0500)

R

Both cokeri and subcokeri will sometimes have a double veil.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-07-25 16:52:04 -05 (-0500)

But they may not always have it. On the other hand, maybe this isn’t either.

Let me think about it.

Rod

ah once again,
By: Geoff Balme (geoff balme)
2017-07-25 13:31:44 -05 (-0500)

I was excited about the LACK of the usual “doubled” veil in this case. I may have to admit to myself that I just don’t have Coker’s nominal species!

Pink staining on bulb base suggests Amanita subcokeri.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2017-07-24 11:20:02 -05 (-0500)

Very best,

Rod

Herbarium Rooseveltensis Amanitarum (R. E. Tulloss) has received specimen.
By: mcmacher
2017-07-20 13:54:18 -05 (-0500)

We have received the dried specimen. Thank you. It is being accessioned in Rod’s herbarium.

Created: 2017-06-06 14:01:06 -05 (-0500)
Last modified: 2018-01-08 19:43:54 -05 (-0500)
Viewed: 75 times, last viewed: 2019-08-13 04:47:07 -05 (-0500)
Show Log