When: 2017-06-07
Seen at: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA [Click for map]
40.5417°N 80.0075°W 369m [Click for map]
Who: Scott Pavelle (Scott Pavelle)
Notes:
Found under spruce. And yes, some of them were right next to the amanitas.
They look really good, especially the one with the clear white netting, but the others have a different pattern to the stipe and were found one tree away. It’s possible there’s two species.
I am not naming a species in order to avoid the jinx.
The finds in the final photo are obviously not boletes, but they were found in a group under a different spruce at the same location. I believe it’s one genus with three species:
(1) two Sphericus bireticulatum, pre- and post-sporulation;
(2) a typical Sphericus dimpleatus; and
(3) two Sphericus tomentosus a/k/a Sphericus fugere-a-canibus. It’s my understanding that the two names have been placed in synonymy.
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 4.86 | 1 | (Scott Pavelle) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.55 | 1 | (John Plischke) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.27 | 75.81% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 5.01 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 4.55 | 1 | (John Plischke) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.38 | 45.99% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.01 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.50 | 83.36% | |||||||
Comments
Add CommentCreated: 2017-06-07 15:04:39 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2017-12-20 16:04:41 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 86 times, last viewed: 2019-11-07 16:47:16 PST (-0800)
Show Log
love the last photo. I laughed out loud:)