Observation 28711: Psilocybe tasmaniana Guzmán & Watling
When: 2009-11-24
Collection location: Kaipara harbour, Auckland, New Zealand [Click for map]
Who: Michael W (Michael Wallace)
No specimen available
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 4.15 | 1 | (CureCat) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 20.21 | 4 | (Alan Rockefeller,AmatoxinApocalypse) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 4.14 | 1 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.93 | 64.42% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 4.07 | 1 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 10.43 | 2 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-1.23 | -41.06% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 9.78 | 2 | (AmatoxinApocalypse) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.14 | 1 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.83 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.53 | 51.05% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.83 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.56 | 85.37% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Not cyanescens
By: AmatoxinApocalypse (AmatoxinApocalypse)
2009-11-25 12:56:58 CST (-0600)
This is the Psilocybe inski has been working on for a while I believe, it is not Ps. cyanescens.
That’s right weiliiiiiii, it’s not Psilocybe cyanescens, it’s closer to P. moravica var moravica from the Czech Republic.