When: 2001-11-18
Collection location: Eureka, Humboldt Co., California, USA [Click for map]
No specimen available
Notes:
Seen at the Humboldt Bay Mycological Society mushroom fair.
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 5.94 | 1 | (nathan) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 9.95 | 2 | (CureCat,Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-1.41 | -47.16% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 5.94 | 1 | (nathan) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.96 | 1 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.79 | 1 | (Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 8.74 | 2 | (CureCat,Noah) | |||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.17 | 5.64% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.40 | 1 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 9.95 | 2 | (CureCat,Alan Rockefeller) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.22 | 40.72% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.15 | 1 | (CureCat) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.61 | 53.73% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
stem too thick
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2008-11-13 21:23:03 EST (-0500)
The stem seems to be too thick on these, should be 2 – 5 mm.
Created: 2006-05-21 03:26:13 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2012-01-04 12:56:34 EST (-0500)
Viewed: 120 times, last viewed: 2019-01-24 14:00:01 EST (-0500)
Show Log
in the tiny photo, the gill color and veil does look reminescent of another psath that i saw back east this summer. hypholoma sp. was just fallback from the wrong Hypholoma sp…entirely possible that they got the genus wrong, too…