When: 2009-08-12
Collection location: Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada [Click for map]
Who: Diane (mcgd)
No specimen available
Notes:
on spruce log. Rocky Mountains
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 4.89 | 1 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 4.58 | 1 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 4.40 | 1 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-0.57 | -19.01% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 8.98 | 2 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.90 | 29.99% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 5.20 | 1 | (darv) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 8.98 | 2 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.28 | 42.55% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 5.63 | 1 | (myxomop) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.85 | 28.31% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Name
By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
2009-12-06 02:48:06 JST (+0900)
Gilbertson & Ryvarden use Amylocystis lapponica and Polyporus lapponicus.
I wonder..
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2009-12-06 02:32:20 JST (+0900)
There are a few things speaking for Amylocystis.
Now I wonder about the name, lapponica or lapponicus – the latter seems to be preferred, but is it really correct..?
Created: 2009-12-05 09:08:47 JST (+0900)
Last modified: 2011-11-10 08:02:39 JST (+0900)
Viewed: 307 times, last viewed: 2018-09-25 10:45:18 JST (+0900)
Show Log
says A. lapponicus…