| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 4.30 | 1 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.43 | 81.14% | |||||||
Comments
Add CommentCreated: 2007-04-01 10:16:54 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-09-05 23:35:06 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 57 times, last viewed: 2018-12-07 14:29:10 CST (-0500)
Show Log
When looking up nigrescens, i came across #517 in fungi of switz, which recognizes the exoperidium falling off in patches and exposing parchmentlike endoperidium, which is what i kind of see here. The spines also look very undeveloped.
Just an idea…