Observation 298103: Lichen P. Micheli


Proposed Names

28% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
Too bad! I thought there were a few lichenologists watching iNat
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2017-11-11 10:52:22 PST (-0800)
I don’t get lichen IDs on iNat
By: James Bailey (Silversea_Starsong)
2017-11-11 10:32:41 PST (-0800)

If it weren’t for you guys, everything would be at “Fungi”!

It would certainly be easy to test
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2017-11-11 10:09:45 PST (-0800)

under a compound scope. But the apothecia are fully immersed when young, and the thallus is rimose, not areolate. Additionally my specimens have a black prothallus, but I doubt that’s significant. Yours is certainly a better guess than mine!

I’m sure you have a good reason why not, but
By: J-Dar
2017-11-11 06:09:05 PST (-0800)
Wild! What have the folks on iNat suggested?
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2017-11-11 00:31:17 PST (-0800)

I don’t even want to guess at a genus for this!

Created: 2017-11-10 23:33:17 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2017-11-10 23:33:19 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 43 times, last viewed: 2019-09-04 00:00:21 PDT (-0700)
Show Log