Observation 301495: Hygrocybe chlorophana group
When: 2017-11-29
Collection location: Haw Ridge Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA [Click for map]
Specimen available
Herbarium record:
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 6.26 | 1 | (Pulk) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.86 | 28.74% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 6.26 | 1 | (Pulk) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
2.59 | 86.23% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Chlorophanae vrs. flavescnes
By: Steve (Lokness)
2017-12-05 10:18:57 CST (-0600)
Is there a particular reasons you placed this in H. sect Chlorophanae rather than H. flavescens? I’m not second guessing you at all just trying to learn from your expertise. In fact I agree with your choice here and am just wondering what the latest thinking is as to if there is one species here (flavescens and chlorophanae) or two.
Thanks!
Created: 2017-12-04 20:35:12 CST (-0600)
Last modified: 2018-01-24 21:07:41 CST (-0600)
Viewed: 49 times, last viewed: 2019-09-05 11:43:46 CDT (-0500)
Show Log
I don’t know how to distinguish the species in this section (H. chlorophana, flavescens, and maybe glutinipes) yet.
I re-approved “Hygrocybe flavescens group” because there are similar looking yellow Hygrocybe species that aren’t in that section (e.g. H. ceracea)