When: 2009-07-19
Collection location: Port Dover, Ontario, Canada [Click for map]
Who: Eva Skific (Evica)
Notes:
[admin – Sat Aug 14 02:04:52 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘Port Dover. Ontario, Canada’ to ‘Port Dover, Ontario, Canada’
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 6.76 | 1 | (Evica) | |||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 4.58 | 1 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 4.89 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.16 | 38.61% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 9.38 | 2 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.90 | 30.12% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.89 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.66 | 55.35% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
was also B. subglabripes. But Boletus gertrudiae also came to mind but unlikely. I can’t tell the stipe texture from the photos but probably would be OK with calling it subglabripes complex…
would be B. subglabripes… But for this species I’m used to seeing more yellow on the stipe, and a little more vivid yellow for the pore surface. Were these photos taken using a flash?
Created: 2009-12-13 09:21:24 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2016-04-23 12:29:18 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 68 times, last viewed: 2017-06-06 08:05:34 CDT (-0400)
Show Log
No flash was used