When: 2018-08-05
Collection location: Peachtree City, Georgia, USA [Click for map]
33.3545°N 84.5617°W 251m [Click for map]
Who: Ian Blaylock (catfish.deity)
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 5.20 | 1 | (catfish.deity) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.68 | 55.92% | |||||||
Comments
Add CommentI’m of very low confidences when it comes to my proposed ID.
I really just looked through the rubescent Amanitas and it seemed to match the best from the picture.
I noticed that the amerirubescens0x species didn’t have a continuous sequence on the amanitaceae site. Is there a reason for that, or am I just blind? I followed the links from the amerirubescens nom. prov page.
some other fungus growing on, or into, the Amanita.
Rod
This is an interesting collection because it would be the first of the code named “taxon” to be found in the south and the first to have a graying volva on the cap. Also, I can’t tell if it was pallid when it first expanded.
How did you decide on your proposed ID?
Very best,
Rod
I found some already had names that were on the site. So there is a gap for Amanita rubescens var. alba (e.g.).
Very best,
Rod