Observation 332284: Amanita penetratrix group
When: 2018-09-11
Collection location: Bicentennial Conservation Area, Newton Co., Missouri, USA [Click for map]
36.8345°N 94.3535°W 374m [Click for map]
Specimen available
Notes:
About 3” of stipe underground. KOH negative. Under White Oak
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 5.69 | 1 | (watchcat) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.85 | 28.35% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.97 | 1 | (cmcassidy) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.36 | 45.26% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 4.97 | 1 | (cmcassidy) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.37 | 45.73% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 5.69 | 1 | (watchcat) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.53 | 17.64% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Looks there are some oak leaves on the ground. Missouri produces so many interesting amanitas!
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2018-09-12 05:36:53 CEST (+0200)
Thanks for posting.
Very best,
Rod
A bit like a pale penetratrix. Not enough yellow for williamsiae.
By: R. E. Tulloss (ret)
2018-09-12 05:34:48 CEST (+0200)
I would be very interested in examing the material to see where it does fall within the Vaginatae.
R
I’m glad the watchcat is watching.
Very best,
Rod