Observation 33543: Agaricus lilaceps Zeller


Proposed Names

76% (3)
Recognized by sight
55% (1)
Recognized by sight: don’t see why this is necessarily A. lilaceps. Slightly more textured surface at least suggests that it might be A. pattersonae.

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
It was under eucalyptus
By: Alan Rockefeller (Alan Rockefeller)
2011-04-03 01:32:34 ACDT (+1030)


The same place as http://mushroomobserver.org/32328

displayed at the BAMS/Pt. Reyes Fungus Fair 2010?
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2011-04-02 02:09:53 ACDT (+1030)

perhaps Alan knows where it came from?

By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
2011-04-01 16:07:20 ACDT (+1030)

I just noticed that this observation is marked ‘seen at’, which means it was not collected at this location. It was displayed there for the public, but collected somewhere else.

By: Christian (Christian Schwarz)
2011-04-01 16:03:22 ACDT (+1030)

I see no reason not to call it A. lilaceps, really, but there is just very little to go on here, and I was trying to confirm it, because so far it is the northernmost record on MO.

More info
By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
2011-04-01 15:50:52 ACDT (+1030)

All the characters might not show in a given photo, but I think Alan Rockefeller brought this in from a previously known site and he had collected more, including some that had opened up.

Created: 2010-02-14 15:00:34 ACDT (+1030)
Last modified: 2011-04-01 15:41:06 ACDT (+1030)
Viewed: 139 times, last viewed: 2019-02-27 14:40:21 ACDT (+1030)
Show Log