Observation 34367: Hohenbuehelia grisea (Peck) Singer

When: 2010-02-12

Collection location: Los Trancos Preserve, Palo Alto, California, USA [Click for map]

Who: Douglas Smith (douglas)

Specimen available

Notes:
Found on the bark of live oak.

The micro-shot is of the gill edge at 400x in KOH. The metuloid cystidia here are numerous. The cystidia are kinda interestingly encrusted, many encrusted in the top half, ending in a hard line.

Adding more micro details:

The second micro-shot is of the squashed gill edge at 1000x in congo red. Here are the smaller cystidia with a single projection.

The third micro-shot is of the squashed gill face at 1000x in congo red. Here are the encrusted metuloid cystidia.

The forth micro-shot is of spores from the gill at 1000x in congo red. The ave. spore size is : length – 7.16 +/- 0.43 (err 0.17) um, width – 5.77 +/- 0.58 um (err: 0.22) – q : 1.25 +/- 0.11, on 8 spores.

With the single projections to the smaller cystidia, from Funga Nordica this matches – H. grisea. It seems some sources have Hohenbuehelia atrocaerulea var. grisea and other have Hohenbuehelia grisea. And Index Fungorum call these synonyms. So, anyway this seems to be a good id, even though others seem to find this id fairly questionable or uncertain.

Images

80123
80124
80125
80185
81398
81399
81400

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

Eye3 = Observer’s choice
Eyes3 = Current consensus

Comments

Add Comment
nice Doug.
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-03-17 07:50:58 PDT (-0700)

OK, I am feeling the pressure to return to my scope…;)

Ironically, IMO, those encrusted cystidia actually showed up better in the unstained version!

cheilocystidia
By: else
2010-03-10 11:29:53 PST (-0800)

Hohenbuehelias have two types of cheilocystidia – those big thick-walled ones with the crystals which take front page, but also, small one with 2 or 3 finger like appendages. you have to squash the slide a bit to get to see those properly

no worries Doug, we can share the pain…
By: Debbie Viess (amanitarita)
2010-03-10 08:44:45 PST (-0800)

I’ll use congo red on my examples of this one from San Diego.

Didn’t use Congo Red
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2010-03-10 08:15:36 PST (-0800)

Well, there are a number of reasons. First perhaps, is that I wanted to see that the spores were hyaline, so I could tell that these weren’t Crepidotus with some tan or pigmented spores, and congo red could obscure that. Also I had been looking at Psathyrella and Inocybe lately (boy the life I lead!), and I wanted to be able to see if the cystidia walls were pigmented. And in the end, because I just hate to use congo red, I just do…

Now that I know that there are no pigmentation to look for at all, which I didn’t before hand, using congo red seems obvious. And I should try to use it in the future, if I get back to looking at these… which will probably never happen. And I’ll still hate to use congo red…

Cool stuff
By: Dimitar Bojantchev (dimitar)
2010-03-10 07:43:18 PST (-0800)

Very cool stuff. Why not use a drop of a colorizer on the micro shot? Congo Red works great in such cases..

D.

Created: 2010-02-28 06:12:02 PST (-0800)
Last modified: 2018-11-08 23:05:54 PST (-0800)
Viewed: 401 times, last viewed: 2018-11-08 23:14:12 PST (-0800)
Show Log