When: 2006-12-31

Collection location: Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Cruz Co., California, USA [Click for map]

Who: fish

No specimen available

About Boletus edulis var. grandedulis Arora & Simonini

MyCoPortal

Mycobank

Public Description (Default) [Edit]

Map

Hide thumbnail map.

Images

Proposed Names	User	Community Vote
Boletus aereus Bull.	fish	-57% (2)
Recognized by sight
Boletus regineus Arora & Simonini	nathan	46% (3)
Used references: This was finally published in late 2008 as a separate species in the journal of Economic Botany in the article “California Porcini: Three New Taxa, Observations on Their Harvest, and the Tragedy of No Commons” by Arora and Simonini.
Boletus edulis var. grandedulis Arora & Simonini	CureCat	79% (3)
Recognized by sight

Propose Another Name

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice

= Current consensus

Proposed Names

Boletus aereus Bull.

fish

-57% (2)

Recognized by sight

Boletus regineus Arora & Simonini

nathan

46% (3)

Used references: This was finally published in late 2008 as a separate species in the journal of Economic Botany in the article “California Porcini: Three New Taxa, Observations on Their Harvest, and the Tragedy of No Commons” by Arora and Simonini.

Boletus edulis var. grandedulis Arora & Simonini

CureCat

79% (3)

Recognized by sight

Propose Another Name

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice

= Current consensus

User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.
	Vote		Score		Weight		Users
	I’d Call It That		3.0		0.00		0
	Promising		2.0		0.00		0
	Could Be		1.0		0.00		0
	Doubtful		-1.0		4.94		1	(nathan)
	Not Likely		-2.0		0.00		0
	As If!		-3.0		4.15		1	(CureCat)
	Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1)			-1.72		-57.46%

Close

User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.
	Vote		Score		Weight		Users
	I’d Call It That		3.0		9.40		2	(nathan)
	Promising		2.0		0.00		0
	Could Be		1.0		0.00		0
	Doubtful		-1.0		0.00		0
	Not Likely		-2.0		4.15		1	(CureCat)
	As If!		-3.0		0.00		0
	Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1)			1.37		45.57%

Close

User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.
	Vote		Score		Weight		Users
	I’d Call It That		3.0		6.17		2	(DRTMaverick,Tamsenite)
	Promising		2.0		4.15		1	(CureCat)
	Could Be		1.0		0.00		0
	Doubtful		-1.0		0.00		0
	Not Likely		-2.0		0.00		0
	As If!		-3.0		0.00		0
	Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1)			2.37		78.94%

Close

Comments

Add Comment

No one has commented yet.

Created: 2007-05-25 00:41:03 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2010-11-26 23:45:26 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 94 times, last viewed: 2017-06-04 18:50:04 CDT (-0400)
Show Log