Observation 361570: Amanita stirps Thiersii
When: 2019-03-15
Collection location: Uruguay [Click for map]
Who: Image Sharer (image sharer)
No specimen available
Species Lists
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 2.83 | 1 | (Tangich) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 5.13 | 1 | (IGSafonov) | |||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 4.49 | 1 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
-0.84 | -27.98% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 6.91 | 2 | (Tangich,Doc Lingo ) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
0.87 | 29.12% | |||||||
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.09 | 1 | (Doc Lingo ) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 6.82 | 1 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.26 | 41.97% | |||||||
A. foetens and A. thiersii are the same species. I have not heard a final word on this, but some evidence was put forward in the last year of the possibility of synonymy. I would suggest that if you give the ID “Amanita stirps Thiersii” you are covered because both the names under consideration are names of taxa in that group whether or not the two names are synonymous.
Very best,
Rod