|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||11.14||2||(amanitarita,darv)|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
is the timing of this mushroom! gotta love CA coastal fogdrip! ;)
Darv, you must have a known patch of these, since you seem to collect them at this time on a regular basis over the years…
This is most definitely what we call porphyria here on the west coast. Whether it matches up with European porphyria genetics…that’s another story.
But I was thinking that the true porphyria may have been introduced to California with plants from Europe (or forestry equipment or something like that). It could easily have happened, because it’s a very common species, at least in northern Europe. Like phalloides is supposed to have done (although it isn’t quite that common here)?
That’s the name we have used for a long time and there are lots of photos of the California material here on Mushroom Observer. I have no clue if it will hold up to the new DNA taxonomy. It seems like every mushroom is getting a new name and the plasticity in the morphology of the species concept is becoming narrow. Where have all the lumpers gone?
but do you really have porphyria in California??
Created: 2010-07-05 18:15:12 CEST (+0200)
Last modified: 2010-07-05 20:54:56 CEST (+0200)
Viewed: 71 times, last viewed: 2017-07-12 10:56:16 CEST (+0200)