When: 2008-01-12

Collection location: Sebastopol, Sonoma Co., California, USA [Click for map]

Who: Darvin DeShazer (darv)

No specimen available

Apex of the stipe shows the cone projecting down from the cap into the hollow stipe.

Species Lists


Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
More data
By: Nathan Wilson (nathan)
2008-01-12 23:36:05 CST (-0500)

At the Santa Cruz fair today I saw a red-brown Hebeloma similar to what Darvin has called H. sinapizans in other observations. I cut it and there was the cone. I meant to hang onto the collection and take some photos, but I forgot to bring it with me and I suspect it is now gone.

A puzzle
By: Darvin DeShazer (darv)
2008-01-12 23:32:43 CST (-0500)

Wow – I said to myself “poison pie” as I collected it, but when it was cut, changed that opinion to H. sinapizans because of the cone. I should have brought it home for a closer scrutiny! So, it looks like both species have the cone.

A puzzle
By: Michael Wood (mykoweb)
2008-01-12 23:00:40 CST (-0500)

It’s very interesting that you post this today. I was just looking at a fresh collection of East Bay Hebeloma this morning. Macroscopically I thought “Hebeloma crustuliniforme” group. After cutting the the mushroom longitudinally, it had the same projecting cone as in your picture…so I thought “maybe H. sinapizans”. After scoping the mushroom, I find non-dextrinoid spores. Jan Vesterholt, in “The Genus Hebeloma” says that H. sinapizans has dextrinoid spores, H. crustuliniforme has non-dextrinoid spores. That seems to leave out H. sinapizans…and the cheilocystidia are not ventricose like description of H. sinapizans in the Vesterholt book. I’m puzzled…maybe this isn’t a good character for H. sinapizans…the specimen is sitting next to my scope for further work, which I did not have time to do today. Further study is needed!