Please do not re-click a link while waiting for a page to load. (It’s slower and degrades site speed for all users.)
To get images for machine learning, see MO Images for Machine Learning


When: 2008-01-20

Collection location: West Los Angeles, California, USA [Click for map]

Who: taylor (taylorist)

No specimen available


[admin – Sat Aug 14 02:07:37 +0000 2010]: Changed location name from ‘West Los Angeles’ to ‘West Los Angeles, California, USA’


Proposed Names

-56% (1)
Recognized by sight
56% (1)
Recognized by sight: clustered growth, white spores, partial veil.
85% (1)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
By: Erin Page Blanchard (CureCat)
2008-01-24 10:36:04 CET (+0100)

I concur.
Armillaria sp. or A. mellea species cluster / complex, whatever you want to call it. ;)

Armillaria mellea
By: Douglas Smith (douglas)
2008-01-23 22:56:48 CET (+0100)

Growth as a group like this, with white spores, we are calling Armillaria mellea. There isn’t much else that grows as a group like this with white spores, and nothing that also has a veil. (Gymnopus acervata is one that comes to mind, but doesn’t have a veil, thinner stipes, and different colors, also is fairly rare.) A. mellea is pretty common right now all over. But in Armillaria there are a number of different species that look pretty much the same, but differ by “clamp connections on the basidia”. Most people don’t look for such, but just call this A. mellea, although there is an argument to be made that what we have in the west in mostly A. ostoyea, so you could call it that too.
(I might have spelled these wrong off the top of my head…)