Notes:
Found by others at the ACCF Albion Foray.
Species Lists
Images
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 4.40 | 1 | (irenea) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 6.10 | 1 | (douglas) | |||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.30 | 43.19% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Spores and capillitium need to be checked
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-02-12 13:40:36 CST (-0500)
and this lacks brumale’s tubular mouth. This might be Tulostoma poculatum, but there are quite a few Tulostoma species to choose from..
Created: 2011-02-12 11:49:51 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2011-02-13 10:43:18 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 51 times, last viewed: 2017-06-08 09:58:50 CDT (-0400)
Show Log
Yeah, probably, I think people were just putting T. brumale on these, as a common Tulostoma name to use. And I think that is what people have done in the past. But yes, I would agree, it is probably another species. I don’t know if anyone kept these, maybe Debbie would know.
Hugh drove over an hour away to find these, and bring them in, that day.