When: 2011-05-01
Collection location: Lourinhã, Portugal [Click for map]
Who: zaca
No specimen available
| User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
| Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Promising | 2.0 | 6.50 | 1 | (zaca) | |||||
| Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
| Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.73 | 57.78% | |||||||
Comments
Add Comment
Amazing macro lens, then! Nice.
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2011-05-09 16:27:33 PDT (-0700)
Oh never mind in that case!
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2011-05-09 15:44:13 PDT (-0700)
No idea it was that tiny. Do you take photo through magnifying glass??
Maybe …
By: zaca
2011-05-09 15:26:24 PDT (-0700)
is a question of the photo. The dimension of this specimen was about 1.2 cm across.
Bluish prothallus looks right
By: Jason Hollinger (jason)
2011-05-09 15:17:59 PDT (-0700)
The lobules look much larger than the material I’ve seen in southern California and British Columbia. Could possibly be different but closely-related species?
Created: 2011-05-09 14:46:49 PDT (-0700)
Last modified: 2011-05-09 14:46:50 PDT (-0700)
Viewed: 30 times, last viewed: 2017-06-09 08:39:16 PDT (-0700)
Show Log